Hammack v. Coffelt Land Title, Inc.

I concur fully in the Court’s opinion, and in its reversal of the summary judgment entered in favor of Plaintiff Thomas Ham-mack. As the primary opinion correctly observes, without knowing the terms of the escrow agreement between the Ham-macks and Defendant Coffelt Land Title, it is impossible to say that Hammack is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on either his negligence or breach of contract claims. I write separately because, in my view, reversal is also mandated based on one of Coffelt’s alternative arguments. Since that issue will inevitably recur on remand, in the interest of…