Legal Opinion

Stoughton v. Rappalo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1817PublishedCited by 5 opinions

New Trial. THIS was a replevin for 631 barrels of flour, tried before the Chief Justice, at Nisi Prius, in November, 1817, when the jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, subject to the opinion of the Court in bank, on a point reserved. The plaintiff, on the 9th March, 1813, contracted to ship 631 barrels of flour on board the Minerva, a Spanish vessel, of which the defendant was master, from Philadelphia to Savanna, at 4 dollars a barrel.

Read the full summary

New Trial. THIS was a replevin for 631 barrels of flour, tried before the Chief Justice, at Nisi Prius, in November, 1817, when the jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, subject to the opinion of the Court in bank, on a point reserved. The plaintiff, on the 9th March, 1813, contracted to ship 631 barrels of flour on board the Minerva, a Spanish vessel, of which the defendant was master, from Philadelphia to Savanna, at 4 dollars a barrel. The flour was accordingly put on board by the 16th March, the ship then lying at the wharf in Philadelphia. On the 16th March, the bills of lading were…

1Opinion of the Court

Tilghman C. J.

This is a replevin for 631 barrels of flour. In the month of March, 1813, the defendant agreed to carry this flour, from the port of Philadelphia to the Havanna, in the ship Minerva, of which he was master, on freight at the rate of four dollars a barrel. The plaintiff, the owner of the flour, put it on board the Minerva, just about the time when notice was received of the blockade of the Delaware by a hostile British squadron. Some days after this, the plaintiff demanded of the defendant, either to proceed on the voyage, .or return him his flour. The defendant refused to do…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weaver v. LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1785
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Witmer v. Commissioners of Lancaster CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1813
  3. Griswold v. MaxwellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1853

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Badger v. PhinneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
  2. King v. RichardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  3. Bower v. TallmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
  4. Keite v. BoydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1827
  5. Tibbal v. CahoonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API