Legal Opinion

Bamberg Banking Co. v. Matthews

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 10, 1925No. 11801PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

Proceedings in ejectment under section 5279, vol. 3, Civil Code of 1922, by Bamberg Banking Company, as landlord, against Addie Matthews, as tenant, before a magistrate. The alleged tenant raised the objection in her return that, the title to the land being involved, the magistrate was without jurisdiction, and, further, that the proceeding was brought under the wrong section of the Code; that it should have been brought under section 5277, instead of 5279. Her contention was that the land belonged to herself and others as tenants…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stewart-Jones Co. v. ShehanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  2. Bamberg Banking Co. v. MatthewsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. StuckeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  2. Monarch Mills, Lockhart Plant v. GodshallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  3. Rufus Rivers v. James Smith, Jr.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2025
  4. Rufus Rivers v. James Smith, Jr.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API