Legal Opinion
State v. Bringhurst
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 23, 2008PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
951 A.2d 238 (2008)
401 N.J. Super. 421
STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Joseph M. BRINGHURST, Defendant-Appellant.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 9, 2008.
Decided July 23, 2008.
Peter H. Lederman, Freehold, argued the cause for appellant (Lomurro, Davison, Eastman & Munoz, attorneys; Peter V. Koenig, on the brief).
Jack J. Lipari, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Theodore F.L. Housel, Atlantic County Prosecutor, attorney; Mr. Lipari, on the brief).
Before Judges AXELRAD, SAPP-PETERSON and MESSANO.
The opinion of the court was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- State v. AfanadorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- State v. McQuaidSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Rodriguez v. ROSENBLATTSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. MaldonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- State v. EllisonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
- State v. WeilNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ARTHUR L. THOMPSON (11-08-1559, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. CARLOS B. GONZALEZ (11-08-1353 AND 12-02-0307, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.