Legal Opinion
Blankenberg v. Commercial Insurance Co. of Newark
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 25, 1987No. C-86-4974 MHPPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PATEL, District Judge.
This action was removed to this court on grounds of diversity. Plaintiff has petitioned to amend her complaint to include an additional defendant, to remand the action to state court, and for sanctions under Rule 11, Fed.R.Civ.P., against defendants’ counsel. Shortly after filing these motions, plaintiff withdrew her motion to amend the complaint. The motion to remand to state court is DENIED, as is the motion for sanctions. In addition, plaintiff moves to amend to correct the names of defendants already named. That motion is GRANTED.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Fifty Associates, a Massachusetts Corporation v. The Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Pelleport Investors, Inc. v. Budco Quality Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Ellen Molnar v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Southern Pac. Co. v. HaightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Coman v. International Playtex, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1989
- MacHeras v. Center Art Galleries-Hawaii, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1991
- Bertha v. Beech Aircraft Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1987
- Casparian v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1988
- Guerrero v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.