Savard v. Cody Chevrolet, Inc.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The action is in tort. The appeal here was taken by the defendant after verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the trial below in the Washington County Court. The defendant has presented four questions for our determination in its brief and argument.
The most important question presented to us by the defendant arises because of the denial by the trial court of its motion that the jury be directed to return a defendant’s verdict, and that the testimony of Dr. Forrest, a psychiatrist, as to emotional and psychological injuries suffered by the plaintiff, be struck from the case.
The undisputed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Falzone v. BuschSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Orlo v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Bowman v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
- Strazza v. McKittrickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Chiuchiolo v. New England Wholesale TailorsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Niederman v. BrodskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Gates v. RichardsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Hughes v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1973
- Hay v. Medical Center Hosp. of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- Vaillancourt v. Medical Center Hospital of Vermont, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1980
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.