Abreu v. Coughlin

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jan H. Plumadore, J.

The court’s November 23, 1988 interim decision and order *1026herein left open two questions: whether the photometer negative calibration results were before the Hearing Officer and if not, was their absence duly objected to. Both parties in response sought in part to reargue the earlier decision and made further legal (and factual) arguments.

Upon further reflection, however, and in light of the November 23, 1988 ruling as to the forms, the court agrees with respondents that absent a specific demand therefor and/ or a step-by-step hearing challenge to the…