Legal Opinion
Luteyn v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided November 1, 2007No. 4:06-cv-00092PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion and Order
PAUL L. MALONEY, District Judge.
Overruling the Plaintiffs Objections and Adopting the R & R Terminating the Case
This matter was referred to the Honorable Joseph G. Scoville, United States Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) on Monday, August 27, 2007.
Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) provides, “Within ten days after being served with a copy [of an R & R], any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court.” Likewise, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72 provides that “[w]ithin 10…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Schriro v. LandriganSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Debra Rogers v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Robert M. Wilson v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. AstrueDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
- Pethers v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
- Koch v. Social Security, Commissioner ofDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023