Legal Opinion
Davis v. Apfel
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 16, 1999No. Civ. A. 97-2398-KHVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs Motion for Judgment (Doc. # 14) filed March 27, 1998. Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.7, seeking judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision to deny her applications for disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq., and supplemental security income (SSI) benefits based on disability under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq. Plaintiff is entitled to seek judicial review of the Commissioner’s final decision…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Glen W. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Danny CLIFTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Marlin SARCHET, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Deborah Kent v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harkins v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2005
- Koenig v. ApfelDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1999