Legal Opinion · Dissent

Whatcom County Fire District No. 21 v. Whatcom County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 2011No. 83611-6Published

1DissentChambers, J.

¶14 (dissenting) — I would affirm the Court of Appeals and hold that the fire district in this case did not have discretion to refuse to issue a concurrency letter.

FACTS

¶15 In 2004, four developers sought approval for projects in Whatcom County’s Birch Bay, an unincorporated area near Bellingham just south of the Canadian border. The Whatcom County Code (WCC) requires that prior to project approval, providers of fire protection services must issue a concurrency letter verifying that adequate capacity exists to serve new developments. WCC 20.80.212(1). The fire district serving the Birch Bay…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. WentzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. WentzWashington Supreme Court · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API