State ex rel. Heatherly v. Shank
West Virginia Supreme Court
cited High Ex. Leg. Hem. §§ 591, 639b, 739; Id. Chap. 195; 38 Mich. 310; 104 111. 514; 2 Dana 452. cited 27 W. Va. 251, 253; Code, c. 10, ss. 14, 20; 7 Waite Ac. Def. 50; 11 Ency. Law 159; Id. 127; Code, c. 125, s. 13; 11 Am. & Eng. Ency. Law 128, n. 1, 2, 3; Id. 129; 15 Neb. 295.
1Opinion of the Court
English, Judge :
This was a proceeding in quo warranto instituted by J. E. Heatherly in the Circuit Court of Barbour county at the *224July term, in the year 1889, against John W. Shank. The petition then filed by said J. E. Heatherly represented that at the general election for this State held on the 6th day of November, 1888, he was duly elected in the manner prescribed by law shorifi'of said comity of Barbour; that the certificate of election thereto was regularly awarded to him, and that on the 11th day of November, 1888, he executed before the County Court of said county approved bonds such…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stone v. WetmoreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
- Murphy v. LoosIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- People ex rel. Midler v. Judge of the Superior CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Cates v. WoodsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1834
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Landis v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
- State ex rel. Fullerton v. Des Moines City RailwaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- State ex rel. Young v. Village of KentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Moore v. HoltWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
- State Ex Rel. Watson v. Dade County Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1945