Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mintiks v. Metropolitan Opera Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 4, 1990Published

1Dissent

Kane, J. (dissenting).

We are not persuaded that this matter should be remitted to the Board for further proceedings.

The majority accepts the Board’s findings that decedent’s attempted rape and murder by her coemployee occurred in the course of her employment, but concludes that the circumstances "strongly support an inference that the motivation for the attack was unrelated to either Crimmins’ or decedent’s employment”. They then criticize the Board for failing to consider "this uncontroverted evidence for its potential to rebut the statutory presumption of compensability”. After making other…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Claim of Seymour v. Rivera Appliances Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Kaylor v. 133 East 80th Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  3. Claim of Wiktorowicz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Claim of Masek v. St. Vincent's Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API