Legal Opinion

Orthopedics v. Hertz Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 2, 2017Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, with $30 costs, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a new trial.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant denied plaintiff’s claim on the ground that plaintiff’s assignor had failed to appear for duly scheduled independent medical examinations (IMEs). At a non-jury trial, the parties stipulated to plaintiff’s prima facie case, defendant’s timely denial based on plaintiff’s assignor’s failure to appear for duly scheduled IMEs, and the admission into evidence of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Cushman & Wakefield Inc. v. 214 East 49th Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Metropolitan Steel Industries, Inc. v. Perini Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Meekins v. Town of RiverheadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API