Legal Opinion

Foust v. Hastings

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 11, 1885PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Buchanan Circuit Cowrt. It appears from the record in this case that the plaintiffs and defendant were engaged in farming and stock-raising, and that differences arose between them, and that some two or three suits were pending in the courts, growing out of their business relations. Pending these suits, the parties entered into an agreement to arbitrate all differences between them, and to submit to the award to be made by the arbitrators chosen by them.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Buchanan Circuit Cowrt. It appears from the record in this case that the plaintiffs and defendant were engaged in farming and stock-raising, and that differences arose between them, and that some two or three suits were pending in the courts, growing out of their business relations. Pending these suits, the parties entered into an agreement to arbitrate all differences between them, and to submit to the award to be made by the arbitrators chosen by them. The arbitrators, after having heard the evidence, filed an award. This action is brought by the plaintiffs to recover a judgment…

1Opinion of the CourtEothrook, J.

I. The agreement to arbitrate, so far as material to the questions involved in this appeal, is as follows: “Whereas, differences have for a long time existed and are now existing between Eliza Foust and Levi Eoust, of Buchanan county, first parties, and D. C. Hastings, of same place, second party, and between each of said parties individually and the said second party, in relation to divers subjects of controversy and dispute growing out of business transactions between the said parties: now, therefore, we, the said Eliza Eoust and Levi Eoust, jointly and severally, first parties, and D. 0.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Conger v. DeanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. County of Jefferson v. Barton-Douglas Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  2. First National Bank in Cedar Falls v. ClaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  3. Ames Canning Co. v. Dexter Seed Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. Turner v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  5. Wilkinson v. PrichardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API