Legal Opinion

Walden v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 14, 2009No. 1D08-2318PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBenton, J.

Timothy Walden appeals convictions for second-degree felony murder, armed robbery and aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer. He contends that the trial court erred in allowing in evidence certain hearsay statements. The trial court did err when it allowed the hearsay in over objection, but the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

“Admission of hearsay cannot be deemed harmless error if there is a reasonable possibility that it contributed to [the] conviction.” Thomas v. State, 993 So.2d 105, 108-09 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (citing State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129, 1138-39…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. State v. BairdSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  4. Conley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  5. McCray v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barcomb v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. PGA National Resort and Spa v. Lori GinsburgDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
  3. Terrance Washington v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API