Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Picopa Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 21, 1988No. 2 CA-CV 87-0164PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

This appeal was taken from the order of the trial court denying appellants’ motions to set aside a default judgment and to quash a writ of garnishment issued on that judgment. Appellee Cheryl Dixon was injured on August 17, 1984, in Tempe, Arizona, when a gravel truck driven by Dinah Hill collided with an automobile driven by Dixon. Hill was allegedly acting within the course and scope of her employment with appellant Picopa Construction Company, a corporation chartered by the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community (community). At the time of the collision, Picopa…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Atkinson v. HaldaneAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dixon v. Picopa Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API