Legal Opinion
Pelton v. McClaren Rubber Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 6, 1938No. 2036PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALEXANDER, Justice.
H. E. Pelton brought this suit against McClaren Rubber Company, J. A. Cato and others to recover certain compensation alleged to be due him under a contract between himself and McClaren Rubber Company, by which the latter employed him to collect an indebtedness owing to McClaren Rubber Company by J. A. Cato. The trial court instructed a verdict for the defendants and the plaintiff appealed.
The material facts are these: J. A. Cato was indebted to McClaren Rubber Company of Charlotte, North Carolina, in a sum of approximately $5,000, evidenced by a promissory note. Ungerman &…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hennessy v. Automobile Owners' Ins.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- McCloskey v. TobinSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Ford v. MunroeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Cox v. WatelskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
- Broadway v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
3Cited by4 opinions
- Southern Traffic Bureau v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Carl "Stacey" Neese, Individually and A/N/F of Logen Neese, Cameron Neese v. Ted B. Lyon, Marquette Wolf, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
- Turcotte v. TrevinoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Southern Traffic Bureau v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950