Legal Opinion

Lord v. Clayton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1961No. A-8709PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Calvert

ORIGINAL MANDAMUS

In this direct proceeding in this Court Owen M. Lord, Judge of the Criminal District Court of Jefferson County, Texas, and C. H. Meyer, relators, seek writs of mandamus. Meyer seeks a writ directing Judge Lord to proceed to trial and hearing of his writ of habeas corpus and directing respondent, Harold R. Clayton, Judge of the District Court of the 136th Judicial District, to proceed no further with a suit to enjoin the habeas corpus hearing. Judge Lord seeks a writ directing Judge Clayton to proceed no further with the injunction suit. Other persons and public officials,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Harris County v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Jordan v. CrudgingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Reasonover v. ReasonoverTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Hamman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Harrell v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Fariss v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Pittman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. State Ex Rel. Dishman v. GaryTexas Supreme Court · 1962

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API