Legal Opinion
Ciotti v. Jarecki Manufacturing Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 14, 1937No. Appeal, 117PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bt
James, J.,
The sole question involved on this appeal is, to what extent shall the injury be fixed under the compensation act.
The referee in his first finding of fact found in part as follows: “Anthony Ciotti was injured on May 14, 1935 while at work in the employ of the Jarecki Manufacturing Company at Erie, Penna.; that the claimant was threading pipe and while removing a nipple from the machine, it caught between the chuck and the rail severing the thumb of his left hand; that the thumb was amputated back of the first phalange, a little less than one-fifth of the second phalange…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lente v. LuciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Berskis v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Claim of Forbes v. Evening MailAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Maxwell's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
- Claim of Tetro v. Superior Printing & Box Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Yaklich v. Union Collieries Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Vince v. Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Sims v. American Can CompanyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Lebanon Steel Foundry & Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Shoop v. Chambersburg Baking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.