Legal Opinion

Burns v. Sabine River Authority

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 5, 1999No. 98-1536PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtI Jeters, J.

Sabine River Authority appeals a judgment that denied its peremptory exception of prescription and ordered that a mandatory injunction issue to require it to remove a roadway that had been erected across an inlet of the Toledo Bend Reservoir and to provide Craig Burns water access to his property within thirty days. In the alternative, the judgment ordered Sabine River Authority to pay Mr. Bums the sum of $35,000.00.

DISCUSSION OF THE RECORD

On April 2, 1990, Craig Burns and Lucy Burns filed a Petition for Mandatory Injunction or in the Alternative Damages, seeking to have Sabine River…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kilpatrick v. KilpatrickLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Taylor v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Burns v. Sabine River AuthorityLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. State, Sabine River Authority v. LuciusLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Chance v. Stevens of Leesville, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Prostar v. MassachiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API