Legal Opinion

Smith v. Vaughan

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1884PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Tallapoosa Chancery Court. Heard before the Hon. N. S. Graham.

1Opinion of the CourtClopton, J.

It may be conceded that, when a note is a lien on cotton, or other property, and the property is delivered to the payee, it is his duty, in the absence of instructions or an agreement, to apply the proceeds of its sale to the payment of the note. The obligations given by the defendant (Smith) to *202Gamble are- for cotton, as the consideration price of lands. Whilst Gamble has a lien on the lands for the purchase-money, he has none on any cotton.' The rules applicable to the deliveries of cotton in this case are the same as to general payments, where the debtor owes two or more debts to the s'ame…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robinson's Admr's v. AllisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
  2. Winter v. BanksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Clark v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Stein v. McGrathSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  3. American Freehold Land Mortgage Co. v. DykesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. Carson v. Cook County Liquor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Bridgeport Land & Improvement Co. v. American Fire-proof Steel Car Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API