Legal Opinion

Specialty Restaurants Corp. v. Gaebler

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1997No. Nos. WD 53241, WD 53279PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPINDEN, Judge.

The parties have filed cross appeals in this attorney fee dispute. Gordon Gaebler, a lawyer, appeals the circuit court’s judgment that he is not entitled to keep a $30,000 advance paid by his client, Specialty Restaurants Corporation. Specialty Restaurants appeals the circuit court’s judgment that Gaebler was entitled to a separate, hourly fee for appealing the dismissal of Specialty Restaurants’ case, and for unpaid fees due on two other cases, and that it was not entitled to interest on the $30,000 advance.

Specialty Restaurants owned and operated restaurants. It hired Gaebler…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wulfing v. Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Royal Banks of Missouri v. FridkinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. Ehrle v. Bank Building & Equipment Corp. of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Graham v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  5. Norden v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Affordable Elegance Travel, Inc. v. Worldspan, L.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Manzella v. Gilbert-Magill Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Travelers Commercial Casualty Company v. Vac-It-All Services, Inc., Respondent/Cross-Appellant.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Hatfield v. Barton Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Rathbun v. Cato Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API