Sedgwick v. Bliss
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for York county. Tried below'before Ñorval, J. Me Or ary v. Ruddick, 33 Iowa, 524. Fnwis v. Hults, 46 Iowa, 76.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
The plaintiffs constitute a firm of practicing attorneys at York, in this state, and bring this action against the *618defendant to recover for services rendered to her in procuring a divorce from her husband. On the trial of the cause in the court below, there was a finding and judgment for the defendant, and a motion for a new trial having been overruled, judgment was rendered dismissing the action.
That the services set out in the petition were rendered to the defendant, is fully established by all the evidence. The case was contested, and occupied several evenings in the trial, and resulted in…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Brown v. UnderhillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- Snyder v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
- Emblem v. Bicksler, McLean & BennettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
- Allen v. ParishSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902