Anderson v. State

PRICE, Judge.

The indictment, containing two counts, in the first charged that appellant did distill, make, or manufacture alcoholic, spirituous, malted, or mixed liquors or beverages, a part of which was alcohol, etc., and in the second that he had in his possession a still, etc., to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited liquors or beverages. The jury returned a verdict of guilty to both counts of the indictment.

According to the State’s evidence J. P. Couch discovered a still on land owned by him but which was leased to one Law. Mr. Couch testified he saw appellant, Law and a…