Legal Opinion
Fidelity-International Trust Co. v. Canalizo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 9, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Finch, J.:
The action is brought upon a promissory note made by the defendant Jorge A. Canalizo and indorsed by the appellant, who is the wife of the maker of the note, and also indorsed by- the defendant Blumenkron. The latter was not served, and the maker of the note defaulted.
Upon the trial the appellant withdrew the denials contained in her answer and stated she would rely upon the following two affirmative defenses set up therein: First. “ That in or about the months of October and November, 1920, while the defendant was *326pregnant and in poor health, the defendant Jorge A. Canalizo, her…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Canajoharie National Bank v. DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Vosburgh v. . DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Joy v. . DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Second National Bank v. WestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- American Exchange National Bank v. New York Belting & Packing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harter v. Peoples Bank of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- State Bank v. BacheNew York Supreme Court · 1937
- Bank of United States v. Cooper-Bessemer Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1932