Legal Opinion

Doepke v. Cocke

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 24, 1932No. 21491PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. An instrument containing terms of negotiability, such as a note payable to the payee, or his order, does not lose its character of negotiability by becoming overdue. Therefore the transferee of a negotiable instrument who acquires it after it has become overdue is not required to give notice to its maker as to its transfer or assignment, in order to establish his title thereto as against subsequently accruing equities between the transferor and the maker. The provisions of see*66tion 3653 of the Civil Code of 1910, which provide that an assignment of a chose in action vests title in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Georgia State Bank v. HardenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Tuck v. National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. O'Shee v. PierceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API