Legal Opinion

Dominick "C" v. Ingraham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 3, 1969PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWitmer, J.

In this article 78 proceeding petitioners seek to compel the respondent, 'Commissioner of Health of the State of New York, to issue a new birth certificate with respect to a daughter born to Mrs. “ C ”*, one of the petitioners, on November 4, 1961. They wish the certificate to show that they are her parents; and their application to respondent was made under section 4138 (subd. 1, par. [a]) of the Public Health Law. Respondent Commissioner ruled that the .application papers did not contain the “ proof ” required by the statute to authorize him to issue the requested certificate.. Petitioners…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Melis v. Department of HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  3. P v. Department of HealthNew York Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Roe v. RoeNew York Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. A----. B v. C----. DIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Barry E. v. IngrahamNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Commissioner of Social Services v. Lazaro F.New York Family Court · 1979
  4. Dana A. v. Harry M. N.New York City Family Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API