Legal Opinion

State v. Huntsman

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1949No. 7192PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WADE, Justice.

Defendant appeals from a conviction of carnal knowledge. The act shown to have been accomplished with a married female just a few days under 18 years of age. He contends that such act does not constitute the crime of carnal knowledge under our statute, Section 103-51-19, U. C. A. 1943, which provides:

“Any person who carnally and unlawfully knows any female over the age of thirteen years and under the age of eighteen years is guilty of a felony.”

Section 14-1-1, U. C. A. 1948, provides:

“The period of minority extends in males to the age of twenty-one years and in females to that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. HilbergUtah Supreme Court · 1900
  2. State v. EmpeyUtah Supreme Court · 1925
  3. State v. ThatcherUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  4. State v. WilliamsonUtah Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Stoker v. GowansUtah Supreme Court · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Oliverson v. West Valley CityDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1995
  3. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  4. People v. CourtneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API