State v. Huntsman
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WADE, Justice.
Defendant appeals from a conviction of carnal knowledge. The act shown to have been accomplished with a married female just a few days under 18 years of age. He contends that such act does not constitute the crime of carnal knowledge under our statute, Section 103-51-19, U. C. A. 1943, which provides:
“Any person who carnally and unlawfully knows any female over the age of thirteen years and under the age of eighteen years is guilty of a felony.”
Section 14-1-1, U. C. A. 1948, provides:
“The period of minority extends in males to the age of twenty-one years and in females to that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. HilbergUtah Supreme Court · 1900
- State v. EmpeyUtah Supreme Court · 1925
- State v. ThatcherUtah Supreme Court · 1945
- State v. WilliamsonUtah Supreme Court · 1900
- Stoker v. GowansUtah Supreme Court · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1962
- Oliverson v. West Valley CityDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1995
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- People v. CourtneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.