Legal Opinion

Endel v. Norris

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 4, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Rusk. Tried below before Hon. S. J. Hendrick.

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Associate Justice.

Appellant brought suit against appellee before a Justice of the Peace to recover a debt less than $200, and to foreclose a mortgage on a mule and a crop of ungath-. ered corn and cotton. He sued out a writ of sequestration, stating in his affidavit therefor the estimated value of the property, aggregating $225. The value of the property covered by the mortgage was not otherwise stated in bringing the suit. The property was seized under the process, and, by subsequent proceedings, judgment was rendered by default in favor of appellant for his debt and foreclosing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. H. F. & E. D. Craddock v. GoodwinTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Maybe, Kahn & Freiberg v. DukeTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Gillies v. WoffordTexas Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Carter v. RolandTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Watts v. OverstreetTexas Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. GallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Burnett Trailers, Inc. v. PolsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API