Legal Opinion · Dissent

Halderman v. Pennhurst State School & Hospital

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 13, 1979No. Nos. 78-1490, 78-1564 and 78-1602Published

1Dissent

SEITZ, Chief Judge,

with whom ALDISERT and JAMES HUNTER, III, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting.

This case poses what is for the judiciary a singularly difficult and sensitive problem. *117At a federal judicial level, we are asked to interpret relatively new and innovative legislation and to embark upon uncharted constitutional waters. At a factual level, the record presents a mass of social science and medical data from which judges are.asked to fashion legal rules.

Initially, I have no trouble agreeing with’ the majority that the conditions at Penn-hurst revealed in this record fall below a…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API