Legal Opinion

Sorrentino v. Sorrentino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 28, 1994Published

1DissentCasey, J.

A review of the record convinces us that petitioner failed to meet her burden to demonstrate a change in circumstances which warrants an increase in child support. A generalized claim that children’s needs have increased either because the children have matured or due to inflation is insufficient (see, Zucker v Zucker, 187 AD2d 507, 509), but evidence of specific increased expenses will support a finding of a change in circumstances warranting an increase in child support (supra, at 509; see, Matter of Adams-Eppes v Fulton, 195 AD2d 455, 456). Although petitioner provided specific dollar…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Zucker v. ZuckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Tripi v. FaielloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Eisen v. EisenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. Popp v. RaitanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Rogers v. BittnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API