Sorrentino v. Sorrentino
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentCasey, J.
A review of the record convinces us that petitioner failed to meet her burden to demonstrate a change in circumstances which warrants an increase in child support. A generalized claim that children’s needs have increased either because the children have matured or due to inflation is insufficient (see, Zucker v Zucker, 187 AD2d 507, 509), but evidence of specific increased expenses will support a finding of a change in circumstances warranting an increase in child support (supra, at 509; see, Matter of Adams-Eppes v Fulton, 195 AD2d 455, 456). Although petitioner provided specific dollar…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zucker v. ZuckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Tripi v. FaielloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Eisen v. EisenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Popp v. RaitanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Rogers v. BittnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.