Legal Opinion
Han v. Financial Supervisory Service
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 5, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2018-0141Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KAREN C. HAN, Plaintiff, Civ. Action No. 18-141(EGS/GMH) v. FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY SERVICE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER I. Introduction Plaintiff Karen C. Han (“Ms. Han” or “Plaintiff”) has sued Defendant Financial Supervisory Service (“FSS” or “Defendant”), alleging that FSS, a corporation established under the laws of the Republic of Korea (“South Korea”) interfered with the contractual relationship between Ms. Han’s now-defunct financial services company, Peninsula Asset Management Ltd. (“Peninsula”), and Hankook Tire…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Republic of Argentina v. Weltover, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.