Legal Opinion

Oliver v. Thompson's Run Bridge Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1900No. Appeal, No. 26PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal, No. 26, Oct. T., 1899, by plaintiffs, from decree of O. P. No. 2, Allegheny County, July T., 1898, No. 843, on bill in equity, in case of William Oliver et al. v. Thompson’s Run Bridge Company. Bill in equity for an injunction. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was the decree dismissing bill.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Brown,

The injunction prayed for in the court below was to restrain *345the Thompson’s Run Bridge Company from entering upon plaintiffs’ land for the purpose of constructing a bridge over Thompson’s run. According to the findings of the court, justified by the testimony, “ Thompson’s run is a small stream in a valley some 350 feet wide, with high and precipitous hills on either side. The stream is liable to flood during heavy rains, and to back water from the river at high stages. The bridge is a wooden trestle bridge extending from hill to hill, a distance ol about 350 feet,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edgewood RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  2. Gaw v. Bristol & Bridgewater RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  3. McCandless's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Windsor Glass Co. v. Carnegie Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Pioneer Coal Co. v. Cherrytree & Dixonville R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Scranton Gas & Water Co. v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Myersdale & Salisbury Street Railway Co. v. Pennsylvania & Maryland Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  5. Webb v. Knox County Transmission Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API