Legal Opinion

GMK DEVELOPMENTS, LLC v. City of Madras

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 31, 2008No. 2008003, 2008005 A13968Published

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Petitioners seek review of a decision of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) affirming the City of Madras’ amendment to its comprehensive plan. The amendment adopts a report that updates analysis of the city’s supply of buildable land that is available to meet housing and commercial needs. According to petitioners, LUBA erred in affirming the city’s decision adopting the report for two reasons. First, they complain that, because the report identifies a shortfall of buildable land, the city was obligated to revise its comprehensive plan to identify additional buildable land to satisfy the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. StamperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. State v. StamperOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Curry Co.)Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Downtown Community Ass'n v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API