Legal Opinion

Ernst Zobel Co. v. Canals

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 29, 1919PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Ernst Zobel Company, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 12th day of December,*1918, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 13th day of January, 1919, denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlin, J.:

The complaint contains two counts; the first is for damages arising from failure of the defendants to accept and pay for 8,000 pounds of indigo in accordance with a contract between the parties; the second is on contract for the balance alleged to be due and owing on the sale and delivery of 3,000 pounds of indigo to the defendants.

*233At the close of the evidence the court dismissed the complaint as to the second count and submitted the first count to the jury, and they rendered a verdict in favor of the defendants. The evidence shows that the latter part of April, 1917, one…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Havemeyer v. CunninghamNew York Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Hawes v. . LawrenceNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  3. Hawes, Gray & Co. v. Lawrence & HicksThe Superior Court of New York City · 1849

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. KolowichMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. People v. HearnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  3. Abbate v. SolanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  4. Symington v. HaxtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API