Legal Opinion

GRESHAM v. HARRIS Et Al.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 19, 2014No. A14A1047PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.

Norris Gresham appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Clifford Harris, Jr. a/k/a “TI,” Echo Studios, LLC, Grand Hustle, LLC, Grand Hustle Management, LLC, and King of da South, Inc. (the “Harris Defendants”) based on the expiration of the applicable statute of limitation. Gresham argues that the trial court erred in granting the motion because his renewal action was timely filed. We agree and reverse.

The issue on appeal involves the proper construction of the renewal statute, OCGA § 9-2-61, and we apply a de novo standard of review. Hankla v.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hankla v. PostellSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  2. Clark v. NewsomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  3. Valades v. UsluCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. Rountree v. KeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  5. Atlanta Independent School System v. Atlanta Neighborhood Charter School, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Res-Ga Hightower, LLC v. GolshaniCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  2. Granite Loan Solutions, LLC v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  3. The State v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  4. West Colo. Motors v. General MotorsColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. State v. Ladarius VickersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API