Legal Opinion
Martin v. Frosh
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 17, 2020No. 1:19-cv-02341Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND STEVEN MARTIN, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No.: JKB-19-2341 BRIAN FROSH, STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents, MEMORANDUM OPINION This petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed by counsel on behalf of petitioner Steven Martin, seeks review of the legal propriety of requiring petitioner to permanently register as a sex offender. ECF 1. Respondents’ limited answer seeks dismissal of the petition on procedural grounds, ECF 6. No hearing is necessary to aid the court in its analysis. See Rule 8(a), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Rose v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lackawanna County District Attorney v. CossSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Lyons v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.