Legal Opinion

Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. Moundville Motor Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 16, 1941No. 6 Div. 883PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

The action was for damages to plaintiff’s automobile resulting from a collision with defendant’s locomotive at a grade crossing in the City of Tuscaloosa.

The driver of the automobile at the time was on a mission of his own. The car had been loaned, or, at any rate, turned over to him for temporary use while awaiting the arrival of a new car ordered for him by plaintiff company. No question, therefore, of contributory negligence under the doctrine of respondeat superior arises in the case.

If negligence on the part of the engineer operating the locomotive was a proximate cause…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Southern Ry. Co. v. SherrillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. BatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  5. Thompson Donohoo v. Mobile O. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ridout's-Brown Service, Inc. v. HollowaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. JarvisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  3. Richardson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Southern Railway Company v. McCamySupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  5. Louisville & N. R. Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API