Legal Opinion
Howard v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided October 5, 1988No. 0899-86PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
The record reflects that Charles Lee Howard, henceforth appellant, was convicted by a jury of aggravated delivery of a controlled substance, namely, amphetamine of more than 200 grams but less than 400 grams. The jury also assessed appellant’s punishment at 15 years in the Department of Corrections.
The Second Court of Appeals affirmed. See Howard v. State, 713 S.W.2d 414 (Tex.App.-2nd 1986).
We granted the appellant’s petition for discretionary review in order to review his assertion that “The trial court and court of appeals erred in…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Sheffield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
4Cited by4 opinions
- Baker v. HooperCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- Calton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Allen Fitzgerald Calton A/K/A Allen Fritzgerald Calton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004
- Allen Fitzgerald Calton A/K/A Allen Fritzgerald Calton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004