Legal Opinion

Pittston Warehouse Corp. v. American Motorists Insurance

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 13, 1989No. 88 Civ. 6238 (RWS)PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiff Pittston Warehouse Corporation (“Pittston”) has moved pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 37 to compel discovery. Defendants American Motorist Insurance Company (“Amico”) and C.A. Shea & Company, Inc. (“Shea”) have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 and for a protective order. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part, their motion for a protective order is denied, and summary judgment is granted in part on behalf of Pittston.

The Parties

Pittston is a New York corporation with…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Gordon v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. The Procter & Gamble Independent Union of Port Ivory, N.Y. v. The Procter & Gamble Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  5. James Joseph Corselli v. Thomas A. Coughlin, Iii, James E. Sullivan, [Pedro] Berrios and Ronald G. BoltCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. German v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  2. Ehrlich v. HoweDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  3. Swan Brewery Co. v. US Trust Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  4. United States v. Mason Tenders Dist. Council of Greater NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  5. In Re Integrated Resources, Inc. Real Estate Lit.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API