United States Ex Rel. Durcholz v. FKW Inc.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BARKER, Chief Judge.
This motion comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs’ False Claim Act (“FCA”) claims, alleging that (1) Plaintiffs’ claims are jurisdictionally barred, and (2) even if jurisdiction exists, neither Defendant violated the FCA 1 For the following reasons, Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART AND DENTED IN PART.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiffs complaint sets forth claims against Defendants Jeffrey J. Strange (“Strange”)…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States Ex Rel. SchumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States Ex Rel. James M. Thompson v. Columbia/hca Healthcare CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Springfield Terminal Railway Company David A. Fink v. Francis X. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States of America Ex Rel. Robert A. Durcholz, and Durcholz Excavating and Construction Co., Inc. v. Fkw Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Minnesota Ass'n of Nurse Anesthetists v. Allina Health System Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- United States Ex Rel. Wilkins v. North American Construction Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2001
- United States Ex Rel. Reagon v. East Texas Medical Center Regional Healthcare SystemDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
- United States Ex Rel. Roby v. Boeing Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.