DeAngelis v. Holmes (In re Holmes)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION1
ROBERT N. OPEL, II, Bankruptcy Judge.
The U.S. Trustee moved to dismiss the Chapter 7 case of Thad M. Holmes. The Motion avers that the Debtor’s case is presumptively abusive pursuant to § 707(b)(2), or in the alternative, that the totality of circumstances evidence an abuse of the Code’s protections, under § 707(b)(3). For the reasons stated herein, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. .
I. JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334. This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).
II. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Th…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- In Re Charles Ellsworth Krohn AKA Charles E. Krohn, Appellant/debtorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- In Re LentonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Stapleton v. Baldino (Baldino)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re: Adam Scott EakinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026
- Karen R. AndersenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020