Legal Opinion

DeAngelis v. Holmes (In re Holmes)

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 21, 2013No. 1:12-bk-01801-RNOPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION1

ROBERT N. OPEL, II, Bankruptcy Judge.

The U.S. Trustee moved to dismiss the Chapter 7 case of Thad M. Holmes. The Motion avers that the Debtor’s case is presumptively abusive pursuant to § 707(b)(2), or in the alternative, that the totality of circumstances evidence an abuse of the Code’s protections, under § 707(b)(3). For the reasons stated herein, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. .

I. JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334. This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

II. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Th…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. United States v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. In Re Charles Ellsworth Krohn AKA Charles E. Krohn, Appellant/debtorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  4. In Re LentonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Stapleton v. Baldino (Baldino)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re: Adam Scott EakinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026
  2. Karen R. AndersenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API