Legal Opinion

Hart v. Bridgeport

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut

Decided March 28, 1876PublishedCited by 8 opinions

At law.

1Opinion of the Court

SHIPMAN, District Judge.

This is «.n action of trespass on the case, against the city of Bridgeport, a municipal corporation incorporated by the legislature of the state of Connecticut The plaintiff [Carmi Hart], a citizen of the state of New York, alleges, in his declaration, that, on June 23d, 1869, he was, and ever since has been, the owner and possessor of a described parcel of land within the corporate limits of the city of Bridgeport, and upon which a planing mill, foundry and other buildings were situate, and that he was also the owner of a steam engine, boiler and other machinery…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oliver v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Jewett v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  3. Hewison v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  4. Mead v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873
  5. Torbush v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Russell v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. City of Seattle v. StirratWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. United States v. King CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
  4. Board of Education of Community High School District No. 218 v. Village of RobbinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  5. Arnold v. City of StanfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API