Legal Opinion
Urban Soccer Inc. v. Royal Wine Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 5, 2016PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.
*449Defendant Royal Wine Corporation moves (1) pursuant to CPLR 3211, to dismiss the complaint; and (2) for sanctions due to the complaint’s supposed frivolity. Plaintiff Urban Soccer Inc. opposes the motion. For the reasons that follow, Royal’s motion to dismiss is granted and sanctions are denied.
I. Factual Background and Procedural History
As this is a motion to dismiss, the facts recited are taken from the complaint (see Doc No. 2)1 and the parties’ documentary evidence and supplemental submissions.2
Royal is a producer, importer, and distributor…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. GiancontieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Goshen v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Weiner v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023