Harden v. Barbaree
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
A bill in the nature of interpleader filed by one of the claimants to funds held by a disinterested stake-holder under Code, § 10390, should set up complainant’s equitable right and title to the fund or some definite portion thereof with the same certainty as if he were brought in under a bill filed by the stake-holder. The , adverse claimant, called upon to defend against complainant’s claim of ownership, is entitled to be advised of the nature of his claim under the general rules of equity pleading. First Nat. Bank of Clanton et al. v. McKee et al., 227 Ala. 573, 151 So.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Finn v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Estill v. EstillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Missouri State Life Ins. Co. v. Robertson Banking Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Steele v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- First Nat. Bak of Clanton v. McKeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
3Cited by7 opinions
- Central Montana Stockyards v. FraserMontana Supreme Court · 1957
- Freeman v. YoungCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
- Harden v. BarbareeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- United States v. JacobsDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1951
- Central Montana Stockyards v. FraserMontana Supreme Court · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.