Legal Opinion
Annan-Yartey v. Honolulu Police Department
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided January 24, 2007No. CV. 06-00166 DAE BMKPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM
DAVID ALAN EZRA, District Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rule 7.2(d), the Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without a hearing. After carefully reviewing the motion and the supporting and opposing memoranda, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion with regard to the section 1983 claims and the Hawaii Civil Rights Act, but DENIES the Motion with regard to the malicious prosecution, civil conspiracy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims.
BACKGROUND
On March 22, and March 23,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Dennis v. SparksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Wolfgang Arnold v. International Business MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Menashe v. Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
- Agustin v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2010
- Debbs v. Valley Convalscent HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Guity v. State of HawaiiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2022
- MFY Funding LLC v. Ohia Opportunities, LLCDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.