Jewel G. Berend v. J. F. Pritchard & Company

Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I; and Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir., 1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part I.

The nature of this cause is somewhat obscure, but it appears to be one in tort for conversion of property or possibly breach of contract. The complaint here contains no allegation of fact showing any…