Legal Opinion

Gautreaux v. Pierce

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 11, 1982No. Nos. 66 C 1459, 66 C 1460Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

This matter is now before the Court on the motion of the Illinois Housing Development Authority (“IHDA”), joined ' in by plaintiffs, requesting that the Court either enforce or modify the consent decree entered on June 16, 1981, between plaintiffs and the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). IHDA seeks an order requiring that HUD include a financing adjustment factor (“FAF”) in the fair market rents applicable to IHDA financed section 8 housing developments that commence construction after June 1, 1982, so that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Michael L. Shakman, and v. Democratic Organization of Cook County, and City of Chicago and Michael CardilliCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  2. New York State Association For Retarded Children, Inc., v. Hugh L. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  3. Gautreaux v. PierceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API