Legal Opinion

Wilhelm v. Czuczka

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 4, 1989No. 7096PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

The minor plaintiff brought this medical malpractice action, through her parents as next friends, alleging permanent ear damage. In the first count of a two count complaint, the minor plaintiff claimed damages for injuries she sustained while under the defendant’s professional care. In the second count, the child’s parents sought recovery for expenses incurred as a result of the defendant’s alleged malpractice. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant and the trial court denied the plaintiffs’ motion to set aside that verdict.

The plaintiffs claim that the trial court erred (1) in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pisel v. Stamford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. State v. WoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. State v. DelVecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Knock v. KnockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Hammer v. Mount Sinai HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  3. Mulrooney v. WamboltSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. State v. OwenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. G. S. v. T. S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API