Legal Opinion

(PS) Andreyev v. Van

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 12, 2025No. 2:23-cv-01403Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EUGENE E. ANDREYEV, No. 2:23-cv-1403-CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 AMY VAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Eugene Andreyev proceeds without counsel and seeks relief under

42 U.S.C. § 18

1983. Plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF No. 24) pertaining to his discovery request for body- 19 worn camera footage is before the court. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants in part 20 the motion to compel, requiring evidence pertaining to the search for the footage, and vacates the 21…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
  2. Louisiana Pacific Corp. v. Money Market 1 Institutional Investment DealerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
  3. DIRECTV, Inc. v. TroneDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
  4. Dichter-Mad Family Partners, LLP v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. Cache La Poudre Feeds, LLC v. Land O'Lakes, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API